Career Tools
CVs, portfolios and job search on the candidate side.
Nothing launched in this category yet.
Be the firstAbout Career Tools
Career tooling covers resumes and portfolios, application tracking for candidates, salary research, networking and the coaching layer around all of it. The category has grown quickly with the arrival of generative tools, and it is worth separating what genuinely helps from what produces volume.
Resume tools are the largest group. The practical advice has not changed much: one page for most people, achievements with concrete outcomes rather than lists of responsibilities, tailored to the specific role rather than generic, and a plain structure that both a human skim and an automated parser can read. Tools that check parseability are useful, because a resume that a system mangles is one nobody reads. The elaborate multi-column designs that look striking are frequently the ones that parse worst.
On generative assistance, a caution earned by the current state of the market. These tools can produce a competent resume and a plausible cover letter in seconds, and the result is competent, plausible and indistinguishable from everyone else's. They are genuinely useful for structure, for translating what you did into clearer language, and for the tedium of tailoring. They are counterproductive when they invent achievements, and that risk is real because the model does not know what you did. Anything on a resume must survive being asked about in an interview.
Application tracking for candidates is underrated. A record of what you applied for, when, through whom, and what stage it reached converts a demoralising scatter into something you can reason about — including noticing that a particular kind of application never progresses, which is information.
Salary research tools are worth using and worth calibrating. Self-reported datasets skew, ranges vary enormously by location and company stage, and a single number is less useful than a range with a sample size attached. Where pay transparency laws apply, actual posted ranges are the better data source.
Portfolios matter enormously in some fields and not at all in others. Where they matter, showing the work and the reasoning behind it beats showing polished outcomes alone.
The unglamorous truth is that referrals outperform applications by a wide margin at almost every company, which makes maintaining loose professional relationships the highest-return career activity and the one no tool substitutes for.
From the blog
Reading on launching, ranking and career tools.







