504,105 visitors this month

Latest reviews

RHRhea Vandermeer3d ago
I put off making a product video for about six months because every previous attempt turned into an afternoon in an editor. Recorded the screen capture, dropped it in, picked a template and had something I was not embarrassed by in under an hour. The part that actually saved me was the automatic captions — most people watch these on mute and I would not have bothered otherwise. My one complaint is that the template choice matters more than it looks like it does; the first one I picked made everything feel like an advert.
Typeframes
TOTobias Lindqvist9d ago
Set this up for a small open source project after people kept asking where they could send something. Took about ten minutes and the first support came through the same week. What works is that supporters do not need an account — that single thing removes most of the drop-off I saw with the alternative I tried first. Payouts have been on schedule. Marking it four rather than five because the analytics are thin; I would like to know where people are arriving from and I cannot tell.
Buy Me a Coffee
MAMarguerite Osei15d ago
Been using this for about four months for content planning. It is genuinely good at surfacing things I would not have thought to look for, and a couple of those became our best-performing posts of the quarter. Worth being realistic about what the numbers are though. The growth figures are directional rather than exact, and I have seen a few topics flagged as rising that were really one large news cycle. I treat it as a list of things to go investigate rather than a list of things to go write, and on that basis it earns its cost.
Exploding Topics
DEDevashish Raman22d ago
I have used this on every backend project for years and it is still the first thing I install. Collections shared across the team save a genuine amount of onboarding time, and the scripting is powerful enough that we run a decent chunk of our integration checks through it. The honest criticism is that it has grown a lot. What was a fast request client now takes a while to start and pushes cloud features I do not want. It is still the tool I reach for; I just notice the weight now in a way I did not three years ago.
Postman
PRPriyanka Balachandran1mo ago
Moved a marketing site and two documentation sites over last year. The thing I did not expect to care about was deploy previews on every pull request — being able to send a designer a working link instead of a screenshot changed how our review process works. Rollbacks are one click and have saved me twice. Build minutes are the thing to watch on the pricing side; our docs site rebuilds often and we hit the limit faster than I planned for, so check that before committing if you deploy frequently.
Netlify

Nutrition

Food logging, planning and dietary tracking.

Nothing launched in this category yet.

About Nutrition

Nutrition tools cover food logging, recipe management, meal planning, grocery workflows and the analysis layer that turns what you ate into numbers. The category is well served and the quality varies enormously, mostly on the strength of the underlying food database.

That database is the thing to evaluate first. Most logging apps rely substantially on user-submitted entries, and user-submitted entries are frequently wrong — wrong portion sizes, wrong values, duplicates of the same product with different numbers. An app with a verified database, or one that clearly distinguishes verified entries from submitted ones, produces figures you can act on. One that does not produces confident numbers built on noise.

Even with a perfect database, portion estimation dominates the error. Research on self-reported intake consistently finds substantial underestimation, and it is not dishonesty; estimating quantity by eye is genuinely difficult. This is worth knowing because it means the absolute totals are approximate for everyone. The trends and the relative comparisons are the useful part.

Logging is also effortful, and adherence collapses over time for most people. Tools that reduce friction — barcode scanning, recent and frequent foods, whole meals saved as one entry, photo-based estimation — extend how long people keep going, which matters more than analytical depth. A rough log maintained for a year beats a precise one maintained for a fortnight.

Meal planning and grocery tools are the underrated half of this subcategory and arguably the higher-value one, because deciding what to eat in advance changes what you eat far more reliably than recording it afterwards. Anything that reduces the daily decision — a plan, a repeated shop, prepared components — does more work than any tracker.

A firm caution: this software is for general wellness. It does not account for medical conditions, medications, pregnancy, disordered eating history or clinical goals, and none of it constitutes dietary advice for your situation. If you have a condition or a complicated relationship with food, a registered professional is the right source, and calorie tracking specifically is contraindicated for some people.

Recipe management is the least fraught corner here and quietly excellent: importing, scaling, converting units and generating a shopping list solves a real daily problem with no caveats attached.